It's Chuck Testa isn't it?

I'm pretty sure you're boned if you don't.

It's really not enough.

This should put him over half

[/b]vote dbauers[/b]

Ah, thanks. I didn't see that particular one on the Wiki.

Dbauers, you ruby?

What's a Chuck?

Oh. That guy. Okay.

Just ignore me guys. I skipped a page.

I think it's called Snoopy in the Wiki.

I'm guessing someone else. But I want him to say it first.

I'm Gordon. I need to kill the vamp. If I target a non-vamp, I RB them. If I target the vamp, I kill it and win. I thought it was weird when the rules say the monsters are the mafia, for me to have to BH one. Then I saw kness' post talking about that rule and how he was alone (on page 1, pain in the ### to do quotes from my phone), so I figured he was the vamp. Targeted him and was told I did not succeed. I don't know if that means my action entirely failed (I was RB or he was JK, etc), or if that means I successfully RB him but "didn't succeed" as far as vamp-killing is concerned.

Of course, even if I don't get lynched, the vamp is going to kill me tonight.

It was in reference to me being neither a hunter nor a monster.

You you certainly didn't target me last night, either.

Then it appears the "didn't succeed" means I was RB. Hopefully I can get the vampire tonight then, cause unless a doctor protects me (and why would they) I'm dead meat

vote: dbaurs

That explaination does not make sense based on the write-up. It shows that someone went after the vampire (maybe a vigilante or maybe a cop), was blocked or was wrong (probably wrong, found out that the investigated person was not mafia), and then WAS FILLED. Based on the write up, Spworldtour was the teenager that was looking for the vampire, not you.

It appears to me that you read through the write-up and grabbed for something that made some sense, but either neglected to rid or connect to that last bit.

In short, your explaination does not match the write-up.

I meant.....WAS KILLED.

Dun dun dun! Well, less dramatic, but yeah.