• RealmsRadio.com
  • HeroClix
  • MechWarrior
  • Mage Knight
  • Vs.System
  • World of Warcraft
  • Yu-Gi-Oh!
  • Monsterpocalypse
  • GridReality Maps
  • CCGDB
  • NetDeck.com
  •  
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Units
  • iTrader
  • Albums
  • Groups
  • Blogs
  •  
Go Back   HeroClix Realms > HeroClix: General > HeroClix Rules Discussion
Reload this Page Here's a stupid question....
Register All AlbumsBlogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices
You are currently viewing HCRealms.com, The Premier HeroClix Community, as a Guest. If you would like to participate in the community, please Register to join the discussion!
If you are having problems registering to an account, feel free to Contact Us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08/18/2012, 02:44
    #1
theharpiece
Member
theharpiece's Avatar
Online
Online Status:
Jun 2011
Join Date:
245
Posts:
12 (100%)
iTrader:
Here's a stupid question....
I was playing Golden Age with a couple of my friends. Now these 2 guys are great players and usually know their stuff when it comes to rules....However tonight they were both insisting on some crazy Nightcrawler ruling....Basically saying that when he usesd Teleportation Evacuation on somebody, because he was "placing" them at the end of the move, that the character would break away automatically.....??? WTF?? I explained several instances where characters were placed and did not get any such free breakaway...They both swore they had seen an orange rule on this, and it worked the way they described....Now this sounds completely nonsensical to me, but figured I would run it by the crowd here and see if someone could clarify for me, thanks!
Haves and Wants eBay Reply With Quote
theharpiece
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by theharpiece
Old 08/18/2012, 03:01
    #2
mbstoner
Member
mbstoner's Avatar
Offline
Online Status:
Sep 2004
Join Date:
1,550
Posts:
0 (0%)
iTrader:
Quote : Originally Posted by theharpiece View Post
I was playing Golden Age with a couple of my friends. Now these 2 guys are great players and usually know their stuff when it comes to rules....However tonight they were both insisting on some crazy Nightcrawler ruling....Basically saying that when he usesd Teleportation Evacuation on somebody, because he was "placing" them at the end of the move, that the character would break away automatically.....??? WTF?? I explained several instances where characters were placed and did not get any such free breakaway...They both swore they had seen an orange rule on this, and it worked the way they described....Now this sounds completely nonsensical to me, but figured I would run it by the crowd here and see if someone could clarify for me, thanks!
They were right. The only time you have to break away from an opposing character is during movement. Placing isn't moving.
Looking for a place to play in NE Ohio/West Side of Cleveland? Look here.
http://clevelandclix.myfreeforum.org/index.php
Haves and Wants Reply With Quote
mbstoner
View Public Profile
Visit mbstoner's homepage!
Find More Posts by mbstoner
Old 08/18/2012, 03:02
    #3
karatejoe1978
Member
karatejoe1978's Avatar
Offline
Online Status:
Feb 2010
Join Date:
458
Posts:
9 (100%)
iTrader:
wait you asking about the figs your taking with nightcrawler, Or nightcrawler
santa stuff http://www.hcrealms.com/forum/showpo...&postcount=118

http://www.hcrealms.com/forum/showpo...&postcount=187
Haves and Wants eBay Reply With Quote
karatejoe1978
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by karatejoe1978
Old 08/18/2012, 03:04
    #4
Quebbster
Hail to the king, baby!
Quebbster's Avatar

Online
Online Status:
Jun 2004
Join Date:
37,196
Posts:
142 (100%)
iTrader:
Quote : Originally Posted by mbstoner View Post
They were right. The only time you have to break away from an opposing character is during movement. Placing isn't moving.
This.
I'm also a little curious about the examples of placed characters needing to break away...
Be your favorite video game villain mafia signups!
Tradelist!
Quote : Originally Posted by Harpua View Post
I am epic fail.
Haves and Wants Reply With Quote
Quebbster
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Quebbster
Old 08/18/2012, 03:06
    #5
CallMeMOTO
Member
CallMeMOTO's Avatar
Offline
Online Status:
Aug 2010
Join Date:
878
Posts:
19 (95%)
iTrader:
Do you mean that they would get free break away from NC on the next turn? That sounds incorrect. They don't need to roll break away from anyone they're already adjacent to in order to be placed by NC after he has grabbed them.
Haves and Wants Reply With Quote
CallMeMOTO
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by CallMeMOTO
Old 08/18/2012, 16:28
    #6
theharpiece
Member
theharpiece's Avatar
Online
Online Status:
Jun 2011
Join Date:
245
Posts:
12 (100%)
iTrader:
Quote : Originally Posted by Quebbster View Post
This.
I'm also a little curious about the examples of placed characters needing to break away...
Ok, I think I didnt convey my point clearly....When Nightcrawler snatches somebody, nobody has to roll break away, because they are being placed. The question comes on the opponents turn after he snatches someone....These guys were arguing that the figure who got snatched, would not have to break away from Nightcrawler, or anyone else he happened to get placed next to on the following turn....

So the examples of why this was wrong were things like;

I tk an enemy fig next to my fig and then on the opponents next turn he wants to move thatguy away, he has to roll breakaway...

I carry a grounded fig with a flyer and place him next to an enemy unit, then on the next turn I want to move him away rom said enemy unit, he still has to roll breakaway.

We all on the same page now? You only need to breakaway when moving of your own volition, but being placed in a square next to opponents figs has no bearing on having to roll breakaway on the following turn, right?
Haves and Wants eBay Reply With Quote
theharpiece
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by theharpiece
Old 08/18/2012, 16:57
    #7
Galactus
Member
Galactus's Avatar
Online
Online Status:
May 2002
Join Date:
3,207
Posts:
33 (100%)
iTrader:
Quote : Originally Posted by theharpiece View Post
We all on the same page now? You only need to breakaway when moving of your own volition, but being placed in a square next to opponents figs has no bearing on having to roll breakaway on the following turn, right?
Correct, if a character was placed in a previous turn and tries to move away from an adjacent opposing figure on the current turn, it would need to roll breakaway unless it possessed a game effect that allowed it to automatically break away.
Haves and Wants Reply With Quote
Galactus
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Galactus
Old 08/18/2012, 16:58
    #8
mbstoner
Member
mbstoner's Avatar
Offline
Online Status:
Sep 2004
Join Date:
1,550
Posts:
0 (0%)
iTrader:
Quote : Originally Posted by theharpiece View Post
Ok, I think I didnt convey my point clearly....When Nightcrawler snatches somebody, nobody has to roll break away, because they are being placed. The question comes on the opponents turn after he snatches someone....These guys were arguing that the figure who got snatched, would not have to break away from Nightcrawler, or anyone else he happened to get placed next to on the following turn....

So the examples of why this was wrong were things like;

I tk an enemy fig next to my fig and then on the opponents next turn he wants to move thatguy away, he has to roll breakaway...

I carry a grounded fig with a flyer and place him next to an enemy unit, then on the next turn I want to move him away rom said enemy unit, he still has to roll breakaway.

We all on the same page now? You only need to breakaway when moving of your own volition, but being placed in a square next to opponents figs has no bearing on having to roll breakaway on the following turn, right?
Ah, that makes things much clearer. In that case, you were correct. Even though the character was placed the previous turn, if the placed character is trying to move away from Nightcrawler, and assuming they don't have some way to automatically break away (Leap/Climb, Phasing), they have to break away.
Looking for a place to play in NE Ohio/West Side of Cleveland? Look here.
http://clevelandclix.myfreeforum.org/index.php
Haves and Wants Reply With Quote
mbstoner
View Public Profile
Visit mbstoner's homepage!
Find More Posts by mbstoner
Old 08/19/2012, 01:03
    #9
hclixinarcadia
Member
Online
Online Status:
Jan 2010
Join Date:
4,075
Posts:
4 (100%)
iTrader:
They probably misunderstood what the Oranges said.

When NC kidnaps a figure, that figure being kidnapped does not need to break away in order to get pulled because it is being placed after NC's action resolves.

They probably took that as the kidnapped figure not needing to break away from NC on the next turn.
2011 Majestx Sn 4 Lge - 1st, Majestx $1K - 4th
2012 WonderCon Top 16, Majestix $1K - 3rd, 3v3 - 1st
2013 Majestx $1K Thanos Trl - 1st, Lgcy NML - 1st
Haves and Wants Reply With Quote
hclixinarcadia
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by hclixinarcadia
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo!

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

ClixCast
Archive | iTunes
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:54.
Contact Us - HCRealms: The Premier HeroClix Gaming Community - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Top
Copyright ©2000 - 2011, RealmWorx, LLC - All Rights Reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.